King George Hospital A&E closure debated in House of Commons
- Credit: Archant
A Labour MP made the case for an A&E department to remain open at a debate in the House of Commons.
Ilford South’s Mike Gapes called on the government to stop the department at King George Hospital, Baley Lane, Goodmayes, from downgrading.
The Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospital Trust (BHRUT) plan will see the department replaced with a 24-hour urgent care centre, making Queen’s Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford, the borough’s closest A&E department.
Mr Gapes said that the future of the hospital continued to remain uncertain whilst the trust remained in special measures.
He said: “If, because of improved management, the situation improves later in the year and the trust comes out of special measures, will that mean — I suspect it will — that there will then be moves to close the A&E at King George because the trust is no longer in special measures?
“There is not the capacity at Queen’s to deal with that. It will take years, considerable cost, and millions of pounds of investment on the Queen’s hospital site before Queen’s hospital is ready to cope with this situation.”
Under-secretary of state for health Ben Gummer said: “I accept that uncertainty is created at the King George site and that the effect of that is potentially destabilising.
- 1 Ten businesses crowned winners at inaugural Ilford South Business Awards
- 2 Pan-Asian noodle bar opens on Ilford High Street
- 3 Student nurse charged with alleged rape
- 4 Boris Johnson tells people to work from home as covid 'Plan B' confirmed
- 5 Fairlop Waters car park to transform into ice-rink for Christmas
- 6 Second Redbridge crime enforcement hub launches in Hainault
- 7 Covid vaccine - one year on: London boroughs among worst for jab rates
- 8 Festive events and family days out in east London this weekend
- 9 Plans to cut up to 600 Tube station jobs amid TfL 'funding crisis'
- 10 Items from Lidl and Sainsbury's recalled over health and safety concerns
“However, the decision was clinically led in the first place, so to go against it would be to go against a clinical decision after several reviews. “The honourable gentleman is therefore suggesting that we make a political intervention against a decision made by doctors.”