Council must pay £4,500 for failing disabled brothers
Victoria Munro, Local Democracy Reporter
- Credit: Archant
Redbridge Council was ordered to pay a family £4,500 in compensation after failing to support two severely disabled teenagers.
The Local Government Ombudsman decided that the pair, now adults, should be paid £1,000 each, while their mother should receive £2,500.
Their mother, identified only as Ms X to protect the family’s identity, complained her sons were left without care to which they were legally entitled for weeks, forcing her to quit her job.
She also criticised the council for failing to plan ahead for their transition into adult care when they turned 18.
The ombudsman found delays in Redbridge Council reprocuring care for disabled children left Ms X’s two sons without proper support from September 1 to mid-September in 2018.
You may also want to watch:
Ms X was only informed in writing about the change the day before and said she previously warned the council one of its key providers planned to stop offering the care her sons needed.
The ombudsman noted: “This fault caused frustration and stress… (and) meant she had to spend time trying to arrange support for her sons and providing the care herself where it was not possible.
- 1 Mercato Ilford 'delayed again' as council pushes for Christmas opening
- 2 Revealed: The most popular baby names in your area in 2020
- 3 'Not acceptable': Residents mount opposition to plumbers' building plan
- 4 Road and rail round-up: Disruptions to travel in east London this week
- 5 Young Citizen nominee: Esha, 4, who inspired thousands to join bone marrow donor list
- 6 Jailed: Men who laundered £25m from cash and carry warehouses
- 7 Cross-party group demands mayor reject Tesco Goodmayes development
- 8 Two more police 'enforcement hubs' to open in Redbridge
- 9 The most expensive houses sold in your east London borough in August
- 10 Police warn of 'violence, urination' as takeaway applies for late licence
“Ms X says the disruption caused by the change in provision meant she had to leave her job, which had an impact on her wellbeing, and a financial impact for the family as a whole.”
Ms X told the ombudsman some of the support which began in mid-September did not meet her sons’ needs. She also said she was left without enough help over the 2018 Christmas holiday.
Her sons turned 18 in January the next year. The ombudsman found the council only started planning for their transition into adulthood a year earlier. For young people with special educational and health needs, this process is meant to begin when they are in Year 9, at the age of 14 or 15.
The ombudsman added: “This was fault but did not cause a significant injustice because the accommodation the family were arranging for A and B was not available until April 2019.”
Redbridge Council originally offered Ms X’s family £3,000 in compensation but this was increased to £4,500 by the ombudsman.
It also asked the council to ensure it starts planning for the 18th birthdays of children with special needs at an appropriate time.