‘Dagger through the heart of democracy’: Row erupts as Redbridge Council removes layer of budget scrutiny
- Credit: Archant
Redbridge Council has been accused of putting a “dagger through the heart of democracy” after voting to change the way it scrutinises its budget proposals.
On Thursday night the council voted in favour of allowing initial budget proposals to bypass its service committees.
Instead, the committees would only get to see formal budget proposals.
A report presented to full council at Redbridge Town Hall said the changes would “facilitate a balance between timely consultation” while making decision-making more efficient.
But opposition councillors hit out at the plans, with leader of the Conservative group Cllr Paul Canal (Con, Bridge) branding them a “dagger through the heart of democracy”.
You may also want to watch:
“It’s not how a responsible council consults, it’s not how a responsible council engages and it’s not how a responsible council should be run,” said Cllr Canal.
He urged Labour councillors to join Conservatives in opposing the changes.
- 1 Restaurant apologises after allegations of verbal abuse between staff
- 2 Co-living development green-lit by council despite 'rabbit hutch' rooms
- 3 Revealed: The most popular baby names in your area in 2020
- 4 Nine Redbridge parks retain Green Flag Award status
- 5 Mercato Ilford 'delayed again' as council pushes for Christmas opening
- 6 Road and rail round-up: Disruptions to travel in east London this week
- 7 Young Citizen nominee: Esha, 4, who inspired thousands to join bone marrow donor list
- 8 'Sick and tired': More restaurants fall victim to Just Eat scammers
- 9 'Not acceptable': Residents mount opposition to plumbers' building plan
- 10 The most expensive houses sold in your east London borough in August
And Cllr Robert Cole (Con, Clayhall) branded the change a “retrograde step”.
But responding, deputy leader of the council Cllr Wes Streeting (Lab, Aldborough) reassured councillors.
“There will be lots of debate about the budget. There will be debates in this chamber and debates at local forums,” he told the meeting.
“We will go at our pace and we will do it the way we want to.”
The proposals were passed, with 34 voting in favour and 25 voting against.