‘Dagger through the heart of democracy’: Row erupts as Redbridge Council removes layer of budget scrutiny
- Credit: Archant
Redbridge Council has been accused of putting a “dagger through the heart of democracy” after voting to change the way it scrutinises its budget proposals.
On Thursday night the council voted in favour of allowing initial budget proposals to bypass its service committees.
Instead, the committees would only get to see formal budget proposals.
A report presented to full council at Redbridge Town Hall said the changes would “facilitate a balance between timely consultation” while making decision-making more efficient.
But opposition councillors hit out at the plans, with leader of the Conservative group Cllr Paul Canal (Con, Bridge) branding them a “dagger through the heart of democracy”.
You may also want to watch:
“It’s not how a responsible council consults, it’s not how a responsible council engages and it’s not how a responsible council should be run,” said Cllr Canal.
He urged Labour councillors to join Conservatives in opposing the changes.
- 1 'Uproar' at decision to fell protected oak tree in Hainault
- 2 Former Homebase development plans approved
- 3 Woodford Green and Forest Gate residents criticise councils over flooding
- 4 Water company apologises for phone line waits as flood response branded 'woefully inadequate'
- 5 More than £5m worth of stolen vehicles recovered in first Redbridge Action Week
- 6 Inquest: Newham driver died of 'misadventure' after Redbridge police chase
- 7 Cost of damage runs into thousands as Clayhall street clears up after floods
- 8 East London travel disruption round-up for the week ahead
- 9 Barts Trust ends major incident but situation 'critical' at Whipps Cross
- 10 Developments approved in Redbridge so far in 2021
And Cllr Robert Cole (Con, Clayhall) branded the change a “retrograde step”.
But responding, deputy leader of the council Cllr Wes Streeting (Lab, Aldborough) reassured councillors.
“There will be lots of debate about the budget. There will be debates in this chamber and debates at local forums,” he told the meeting.
“We will go at our pace and we will do it the way we want to.”
The proposals were passed, with 34 voting in favour and 25 voting against.