View from City Hall: Londoners want more police, not less

Keith Prince AM is concerned about the cut to police numbers.

Keith Prince AM is concerned about the cut to police numbers. - Credit: Archant

After a horrendous year of record crime in 2019, lockdown saw the number of some offences fall for the first time in years.

However, as lockdown eases, Sadiq Khan’s plan to cut London’s police by £110million risks allowing violent crime to return to Redbridge’s streets again.

The Mayor of London is proposing to cut the considerable sum from the Metropolitan Police over the next two years as City Hall faces a £493million black hole due to the coronavirus crisis.

Once again, Khan has got his priorities wrong and is putting City Hall waste above keeping Londoners safe.

Sadiq Khan’s police cut plan risks undoing the government’s good work to bolster policing in London.

You may also want to watch:

An extra 1,369 police officers will be recruited in London this year in the first tranche of the government’s promise to put 20,000 more officers on the beat across the country. However, Khan’s police cuts are the equivalent of cutting nearly 1,700 officers.

In the London Assembly, together with my colleagues, I proposed axing Transport for London’s nominee passes to save money.

Most Read

These wasteful passes offer free travel to the flatmates and lodgers of TfL staff and last year it cost London a record £44million in lost fare revenue.

Disappointingly, Labour voted it down, choosing to protect a TfL perk instead of London’s police officers.

The mayor needs to get his priorities right. Londoners want the police to bolstered, not cut. No one wants to return to the soaring violent crime of the past four years.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus