Plans for retail park development move step closer
Victoria Munro, LDRS
- Credit: Google
Councillors have approved outline plans to redevelop a retail park in Ilford.
Initial plans for a 29-storey development – including the demolition of a supermarket, probation centre, car park and gym – were given the green light at a planning committee meeting on July 15.
Montreaux Ilford Developments intends to build 627 homes on Ilford Retail Park and a new primary school where the neighbouring probation centre currently stands.
Committee members unanimously approved the outline plans.
A lawyer for the probation centre’s owner, Greg Cooper, said the developer had decided to co-opt his client’s building because it “could not make the school work on their site”.
You may also want to watch:
Greg told the meeting: “All my client asks is to be treated fairly at every stage of the process.
“He would redevelop when the lease allows him to do so or even sell it, if the council replaced it with an equivalent investment.
- 1 Driver dies after Ilford shopfront crash
- 2 Chigwell child sex offender who posed as teen online jailed
- 3 Driver in critical condition after Ilford shop crash
- 4 Motorbike 'deliberately' struck by car in Redbridge, police say
- 5 Investigation underway as 20 dead birds recovered from Goodmayes Park lake
- 6 Man rushed to hospital after being robbed and stabbed in Ilford
- 7 'Very challenging': Ilford businesses still struggling months after return
- 8 Chadwell Heath station assault witness appeal
- 9 'She has a chance to fight it': Donor match for leukaemia patient Esha
- 10 Jailed: ‘Opportunistic predator’ who kidnapped and raped woman
“For ten years, my client has had an investment in the future of Ilford and, the next minute, you take it away from him and give it to a developer recently arrived in the borough.”
The developer said it had had “extensive conversations” with the building’s owner over the last two years but said the dispute was “not a planning consideration”.
They added that they had discussed acquiring the land through the council’s Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) powers if necessary, “essentially safeguarding that land for a school”.
The council’s education department is currently advising the Department of Education to halt plans for two new schools in the borough, as decreasing class sizes threaten existing schools’ finances.
The site is less than five minutes walk away from Winston Way Primary School but officers insisted the new school “may be delivered later… dependent on the demand for school places”.
Committee member Gurdial Bhamra said he was concerned by plans to put the school’s play area on the roof because of space limitations.
However, the council’s head of planning Brett Leahy insisted this was appropriate for an “urban school”, which had “been designed in collaboration with those specialised in school design”.
The committee also received an objection from Capital Industrial LLP, owner of the neighbouring Redbridge Enterprise Centre, which fears clashes between businesses and future residents.
Their representative wrote: “Block D, located immediately overlooking a fully operational service yard, with no attempt at any form of separation, will inevitably lead to future conflict.
“The construction and eventual occupation of 627 [homes] and a three-form primary school in part utilising the same access as the REC does not present a plausible strategy and will generate significant conflict.”
However, council officers responding to their objection insisted the site is allocated for housing in the Local Plan, adding: “Current uses on the adjoining site could be replaced in future.”
They also pointed out that the plans submitted are still only at outline stage and that “the detailed design can evolve to further address any current concerns.”
Asked by the committee’s vice-chair, Paul Merry, why they were considering outline plans, the developer’s planning consultant explained it was to allow the current details “to be fixed” before more detailed work commenced.
Cranbrook ward councillor Varinder Singh-Bola told the meeting: “It’s a challenging site… whatever you do, it will always be challenging to try to tick all the boxes and make it worthwhile.
“I’m pleased some of our comments have been taken on board, with regards to having the taller buildings towards the rear of the site.”