Ilford man jailed for possessing a gun freed by judges after conviction overturned
A man serving a prison sentence for a firearms offence has been freed after judges decided to overturn his conviction.
Thomas Cudjoe, 29, of Richmond Road, Ilford was sentenced to five years in prison at Snaresbrook Crown Court in June after he was convicted of possessing a firearm.
The handgun had been used to fire a bullet cartridge which was found near the spot in Ilford where two men were shot and seriously injured in August 2010.
Mr Cudjoe was tried for attempted murder and causing grievous bodily harm (GBH), but acquitted on the crown court judge’s direction due to a lack of evidence.
His firearms conviction also went the same way after prosecution lawyers decided not to oppose his appeal to Lord Justice Goldring, Justice Hedley and Justice Calvert-Smith on Thursday.
At the previous trial, prosecution lawyers put forward evidence of a complaint by another man that Mr Cudjoe had threatened him with a gun on another occasion.
Lord Justice Goldring said he doubted whether admitting the “prejudicial” evidence of the alleged threats was the right thing for the trial judge to do.
- 1 RideLondon 2022: East and central London roads among 100 miles of closures
- 2 Two people arrested following Ilford drugs lab bust
- 3 Revealed: Your favourite fish and chip shop in east London
- 4 Five jailed after 'cold blooded' murder of Enfield father
- 5 Boy, 2, injured after 'dog attack' at funfair
- 6 Labour wins Mayfield seats in delayed election
- 7 Travel bulletin: Havering, Redbridge, Barking and Dagenham
- 8 Maskless passengers on London trains and buses fined 4,000 times
- 9 Girl, 17, held on suspicion of terrorism offences after east London arrest
- 10 The Queen’s Platinum Jubilee flypast: Where, and when, the planes will fly over north and east London
The defendant’s lawyers had also argued that, once he was acquitted of the attempted murder and GBH charges, the jury should have been discharged and a new one sworn in to consider the firearms allegation.
Lord Justice Goldring said the jurors had already heard emotive evidence about the gunshot victims’ injuries, which was irrelevant to the firearms offence they were then considering.
He added: “We allow the appeal. The respondent is not seeking a retrial. That, in our view, is the correct decision. There would be no reasonable prospect of conviction. The appellant is therefore free to go.”