Search

Union slams “outrageous” costing as London Fire Brigade’s spend on Redbridge stations revealed

PUBLISHED: 07:00 25 January 2019 | UPDATED: 07:23 25 January 2019

Hainault Fire Station. Picture: Steve Poston

Hainault Fire Station. Picture: Steve Poston

Archant

London Fire Brigade spent more than £350,000 on Redbridge’s fire stations over four years, including on a kitchen refurbishment that went £31,000 over budget.

Freedom of Information data obtained by the Recorder showed the brigade has shelled out a total of £11.8m in upgrades to its estate since 2015, with £351,135 spent on jobs in Redbridge.

The Fire Brigades Union has slammed the “ludicrous” amount spent on works after firefighters have faced years of real-terms pay cuts.

But an LFB spokesperson insisted the works were justified, saying its stations “require robust and industrial-standard equipment as they are in constant use and must be built to last.”

Among the works paid for in Redbridge was £140,863 for a new kitchen for Hainault Fire Station, which was finished by Essex-based firm B Nokes in March 2017 and was expected to cost £109,173.

The brigade is also set to pay £192,255 for roof works at Hainault while replacement doors to the appliance bay cost £66,940 to install over 12 months.

Regular contractor Smith & O’Sullivan was paid £31,234 to redecorate Ilford Fire Station, and an LED lighting upgrade at Ilford cost £27,020.

A replacement boiler at Woodford Fire Station cost £12,525 and the water heating system was also replaced to the tune of £20,709.

Elsewhere LFB spent £1.2m re-fitting its Union Street headquarters, including £134,510 on the shower rooms and £222,848 on replacement chillers that took one day to install.

The re-fit took place so that the brigade could sublet part of the buildings and by 2015 had already led to £9.8m being raised in revenue from the tenant.

It is also set to fork out £87,000 on waterless urinals for 41 sites and £584,000 on electric charge points for its fire engines.

A small cluster of companies have received the lion’s share of high-value works, with six firms receiving almost £6m for their work across the estate.

At Poplar Fire Station in East London, a firm charged £30 to remove two toasters from their boxes and plug them in.

Gareth Beeton, London regional chair of the Fire Brigades Union, said members had raised concerns about work at their local stations.

Mr Beeton said: “In this time of restricted budgets from central government, it’s absolutely outrageous they are spending all this money.

“How are they deciding who needs to do the work and how to get the best deal? It seems ludicrous how much they are spending on small jobs, and bizarre how they allocate them.”

In recent years firefighters have been subject to a one per cent pay cap in line with other public sector workers, and in 2018 were offered a two per cent pay increase, compared to 3.5 per cent for teachers and some NHS staff.

A London-based firefighter, who asked not to be named, said: “We’ve had years of pay cuts; my wages have decreased by roughly 14 per cent since 2010.

“It’s been a running joke that any job that the fire brigade takes on, you might as well double the number and they’ll pay it. Even though it’s not our money, it’s absolutely our money; my taxes pay my wages.”

An LFB spokesperson said LFB cannot use the money raised from capital for non-capital projects, so money for refurbishing fire stations cannot be diverted to staff payment.

They said: “Firefighter pay is based on a national framework and individual fire and rescue services have to work within these structures.

“All contracts follow a competitive tendering process common to all GLA organisations.

In respect of the toasters, they added: “The main contractor was responsible for accepting delivery, unpack, install and verify the operation of new kitchen appliances. They were also responsible of disposing all packaging and therefore have to hold a waste transfer licence.”

Barry Nokes, director of B Nokes, said the works had come about as a result of a competitive tender exercise, adding that if his firm had won the majority of tenders, it was because it offered the best value for money.

He added: “As a small contractor, I would regard this is a positive achievement, having successfully tendered for the works that we have completed and being giving the opportunity to compete against other companies, where 95% of my work force is based in North East London, it is undoubtedly good for local jobs.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Ilford Recorder

Hot Jobs

Show Job Lists